FROM THE EDITOR
In this Issue
Contributors
Letters to the Editor
Write to Us
Spread the Word
Back Issues
Index
Register

FEATURE
Phrasal verbs international

Your questions
answered


COLUMNS

Focus on Phrasal Verbs:
Introduction
Register and phrasal verbs

New word of the month
New abbreviations
and acronyms

Corpora tips
More than simple searching:
getting more from the BNC


Your questions answered

In this section of the magazine, from time to time, we'll be sharing with you questions which have been sent to us. The answers will be provided by Gwyneth Fox, Dictionaries Publisher at Macmillan Education.

Since the publication of the Macmillan English Dictionary (MED) in 2002 Gwyneth has travelled far and wide and given lots of workshops, talked to many teachers and students and answered hundreds of questions about words and how words are described in dictionaries.

You may find that you've had the same queries yourself, or that your students keep coming up with similar questions. But if you feel that you still have a few more lexical questions that you'd like to get off your chest, fill in this form and we'll get back to you!

Your questions answered
press on
I quite like the illustrations, entries and examples in the Macmillan English Dictionary, but I think some verbs lack certain meanings. For example, press on also has a meaning 'to hurry', but in your dictionary I cannot find that meaning. Am I right in thinking that such a meaning exists?
I've been looking at the evidence for the use of press on to mean 'hurry', and really I think 'hurry' is only part of the meaning. It actually is used to mean 'to continue doing something, often when there are some difficulties in doing it'. And this 'continue' can include going from where you are to somewhere else, often hurrying to get there. You could see this as a separate meaning, but I think it's included in the definition given in MED at 'press ahead or press on'. It's not very common, and it does have extra features rather than just 'hurry', and I wouldn't want people to use press on instead of hurry, as that would give the wrong 'feel' to their discourse.
wander

While doing research on ways of walking, I came across what I consider a contradiction between the definition and one of the examples of the verb wander:

definition: 'to travel from place to place, especially on foot, without a particular direction or purpose'
example: He wandered the countryside, looking for his son.

What I understand from the example is that this action is performed with a particular purpose ('looking for his son'). Is this example, or the definition, incorrect?

This is a really interesting query. At first I agreed with you that this was a bad example, as he obviously did have a purpose – i.e., as you say, looking for his son. But the more I thought about it, the more I could see why wander had been used and why I think the definition is not wrong. He didn't know where he was going, he just went from one place to another without any reason for going there, he'd no idea where he'd find his son, and so his wanderings were, to some extent, purposeless. His travel was not efficient, he'd no destination in mind. So it's the movement that doesn't really have a purpose, even though he's searching for his son. In fact you could say 'He wandered from place to place, searching for his lost son', and then it is more obvious that the wandering is not well directed.